Situações argumentativas na abordagem da natureza da ciência na formação inicial de professores de física

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2007
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigo Drumond Vieira
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/FAEC-85JH8P
Resumo: In this present study we try to describe and understand the argumentative situations concerning to the Nature of Science which have occurred in one subject of Physics Practice Teaching. Our observations and analysis have privileged the teachers actions in order to characterize the manners in which he manager and orient the argumentative situations. This focus had permitted to distinguish and comprehend an entirety of exemplar characteristics of the arguments and actions engendered by the teacher. It was possible to identify the argumentative situations and to characterize tendencies, macro and microscopic aspects from these situations, considering the integration of diverse perspectives in the argumentative field. The Toulmin model was essential in analysis, permitting to emphasize that refutations and bases enclosed in the teachers arguments may be favorable to establish a dialogic and authoritarian speech, respectively. In general, the argumentative situations were not so frequent in the discourse produced in classroom. In these situations, the prospective teachers had presented few arguments with content relative to visions about the Nature of Science. Our focus on the teacher emphasizes that he assumed three main roles: evaluator of opinions and arguments, speech manager and a careful listener. In the execution of these roles the teacher had demonstrated in his actions an extensive variety of procedures, in which we verified the construction of arguments with contents of diverse dominion of knowledge, including contents related to the visions about the Nature of Science. The results of this study suggest that the spot of the Nature of Science teaching and Argumentation should be reevaluated in the Physics course curriculum. Moreover, the results regarding to the exemplar actions of the investigated teacher might be useful as reference to other teachers in argumentative situations of teaching and learning.