Anemômetro Baseado no Método de Tempo de Trânsito: Estudo comparativo de arquiteturas, avaliação de incertezas e implementação.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2004
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Will Ribamar Mendes
Orientador(a): CATUNDA, Sebastian Yuri Cavalcanti lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Maranhão
Programa de Pós-Graduação: PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ENGENHARIA DE ELETRICIDADE/CCET
Departamento: Engenharia
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tedebc.ufma.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/361
Resumo: Anemometers are instruments, simply, for measuring the velocity of fluids and, in some cases, its direction. Particularly, the measurement of the air velocity extends to applications like: windmills, wind tunnels, electricity generation from Aeolian energy and meteorology. Among the most used methods for the wind velocity determination, the method based on the transit time of ultrasonic waves is stressed for being more suitable to the measurement of the velocity of gases, and which is based on the time required for an ultrasonic wave emitted from a transmitter to reach a receptor. Among the techniques for implementing the transit time the Difference of Time (DT) and Difference of Phase (DP) are emphasized, and both are addressed ins this work. A comparative study, with experimental verification, between the two techniques (DT and DP) is presented in this work, using techniques for compensating the effects of temperature variation on the sound velocity. It was taken into consideration the implementation of the measurement circuits and the propagation of uncertainties with respect to the variables that interfere in the measurement process. From the analyses carried out, the most suitable method for measuring the wind velocity was chosen, and a prototype was developed based on this method. The most suitable method is the Difference of Phase, because the observed uncertainty, in both simulations and experiments, was much smaller than for the DT method.