Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lacerda, Ana Carolina Borges de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Oliveira Neto, Pedro Adalberto Gomes de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Oliveira Neto, Pedro Adalberto Gomes de,
Santos, Altair José dos,
Marques, Rodrigo Vieira,
Martins Filho, José Reinaldo Felipe |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia (FE)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação - FE (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10682
|
Resumo: |
This study intends to present the conceptual and philosophical categories so-called difference and negation. These categories are fundamental to comprehend the concept of recognition, and, thereby, to present an observation about subjectivity in Psychology. An interaction between German philosopher Georg W. F. Hegel (1770-1831). The research method is the development one, which uses measurement patterns according to the conscious’ experience with the Other, which is described in the central work of this study, The Phenomenology of Spirit. The research’s purposes are: to present the difference and negation categories, from the Consciousness section to the Master-slave dialectic in the Self-Consciousness section; to discuss the negation and difference categories by the recognition concept; to think about the recognition process in order to build subjectivity. Therefore, the first chapter is destined to Hegel’s historical contextualization and work, in order to discuss the criticism about modern dualism and its correspondence to Psychology. On the other chapters, the discussion is centered on the difference and negation categories regarding Consciousness and Self- Consciousness. The final reflection shows the ontological necessity generated by the discussion about subjectivity in Psychology, which must come from Philosophy. Therefore, this study is based on an interaction between Psychology and Philosophy. |
