Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Castro, Iury Oliveira
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Estrela, Carlos
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Estrela, Carlos,
Valladares Neto, José,
Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves de,
Sousa Neto, Manoel Damião de,
Pécora, Jesus Djalma |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5880
|
Resumo: |
Introduction: The incorporation of new alternatives and methods apply to the orthodontics for the analysis of crown angulation and inclination is a challenge. The contribution of tools that enable three-dimensional analysis has been gradually incorporated into dental research. Objective: This study evaluated the crown inclination and angulation of patients in orthodontic treatment using digital models and cone beam computed tomography. Methodology: With the three-dimensional cephalometric software was created cephalometric analysis to evaluate the crown angulation and inclination in digital models of 26 patients, except second and third molars. For the results of crown angulation and inclination based on Camper and Frankfurt plans were required cone beam computed tomography images. Student's t- test was used to compare the intra and inter-group averages and Pearson's correlation coefficient used to evaluate the results between the groups Camper, Frankfurt and occlusal. Results: The analysis of the reproducibility of the method did not reveal a statistically significant difference. In assessing intra-group before and after orthodontic treatment the lower lateral incisors, the lower right first molar, the canine, and the first and second premolars presented statistically significant differences in crown inclinations. The upper right first molar and the lower left molar, the lower second premolar, the lower right first premolar, and the lower lateral incisors presented statistically significant differences in angulation. In the intergroup evaluation, post treatment and prescriptions, all of the results of the crown inclination and angulation presented statistically significant differences except the crown angulation of the second superior premolars and the first inferior molars. The study shows that between the Camper-occlusal, the Camper-Frankfurt and the Frankfurt-occlusal planes, the measures of the crown inclination for incisors and canine teeth did not present a correlation and other correlations were weak or inverse. The results of the crown angulation presented a strong correlation, except for central inferior incisors and upper lateral incisors, which demonstrated a moderate correlation to the Camper-occlusal and Frankfurt-occlusal planes. Conclusion: The crown angulation and inclination can be determined by means of digital models and it is evident that there is a need for additional bend to obtain crown angulation and inclination with values close to those recommended in preset brackets. The measures of the crown angulation and inclination presented correlations when evaluated by the Camper, Frankfurt and occlusal planes with the exception of the crown inclination of the incisors and canine teeth. |
