Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Trindade, Claudia do Amaral
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Orientador(a): |
Resende, Maria do Rosário Silva
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Banca de defesa: |
Resende, Maria do Rosário Silva,
Roure, Susie Amâncio Gonçalves de,
Borges, Lenise Santana,
Santos, Lívia Gomes dos |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia (FE)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação - FE (RMG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/12708
|
Resumo: |
The present research aims to understand the academic experience of lesbian students from higher education courses in a campus of the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Goiás, related to the perception of their school experiences in situations of sexual prejudice. There are few studies that link sexual prejudice and lesbophobia in the educational sphere. In this qualitative and empirical direction, this study, epistemologically directed by critical society theory (Frankfurt School), serves in a complementary way to feminist theories (Simone de Beauvior, Adrienne Rich, Bell Hooks, Joan Scott and others) in understanding the impact that the unequal system between sex and gender has on the school experience of these students. The methodology used is based on the application of questionnaires and semi-directed interviews with students and by conducting content analysis with a Frankfurtian focus on the main institutional documents produced (Plano Político Pedagógico Institucional (PPPI), Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional (PDI), three Course Projects (PPCs) and the Regulation to the student). The determined results denote a distance between what is advocated in institutional documents and the reality experienced by the students. In their view, the IFG is considered the space of welcome and respect distinctly from the family environment. On the other hand, it is verified that the academic community (students) pay attention on the plurality of its subjects as long as this group has affinities. The deepening of further studies suggests the involvement of other entities that encompass the school community, potentiating anti-homophobic postures. Therefore, it is added the relevance of these discussions with institutional decisions in order to ensure political direction and the construction of regulations that guide permanent practices and prevention to any type of prejudice. |