Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Teodoro, Heitor Ventura
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Guimarães, Gilson Natal
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Gomes, Ronaldo Barros,
Trautwein, Leandro Mouta |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia Civil (EEC)
|
| Departamento: |
Escola de Engenharia Civil - EEC (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/3150
|
Resumo: |
This study presents the results of an experimental research on shear in self compacting concrete beams. The influence of beam depth and longitudinal reinforcement ratio in beams was evaluated and results compared with similar beams cast with conventional concrete beams. Cracking, deformations in compression strut, vertical displacements, reinforcement deformation and load failure and failure mode were evaluated. Sixteen 1000 mm long beams with a 150 mm cross sectional width were tested. Eight beams were cast with self compacting concrete and eight with conventional concrete. Both were designed for a concrete fck = 25 MPa. The longitudinal reinforcement of each beam was design to ensure shear failure. Each group consisted of eight beams with four beams had a longitudinal reinforcement ratio of 1.3% and beam depths of 20 cm, 25 cm, 30 cm and 35 cm in height, and the other four beams had longitudinal reinforcement ratio of 2,3% with the same beam depths. The beams were instrumented with seven LVDT's, five of which were positioned to read vertical displacements and the other two were glued on the side of the beam for measuring crack width and displacements in the compression strut. Four strain gages used in the beam’s longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. The beams were tested to failure with a concentrated load at midspan. The results showed that all the beams failed by crushing of the concrete compression zone above the shear crack. Overall, conventional concrete beams ultimate loads were between 9% and 18% greater than those obtained with the self compacting concrete beams, and the difference was slightly higher in the beams with 1.3% of longitudinal reinforcement ratio. This increased resistance of conventional concrete beams was due to greater aggregate interlock which occurs due to the greater number and larger maximum aggregate size in conventional concrete. Interlock mechanism was also responsible for the largest width of diagonal cracks in conventional concrete beams, on average 21% higher than in self compacting concrete beams, and the ratio between higher ultimate load and load at the first diagonal crack, on average 28% higher. The largest diagonal crack width led the transverse reinforcement of the conventional concrete beams to deform, on average, 64% more than the self compacting concrete beams. All three standards considered (NBR 6118:2007, Eurocode and ACI 318:2011 2:2003) were conservative and underestimated the ultimate shear load, mainly by the fact that in none of them take into account the arching action, which occurs in beams with ratio a/d < 2.5. The average ultimate loads of the beams were 73.1% higher than those calculated by the standards. |
