Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2007 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
ASSIS, Henrique Lima
 |
| Orientador(a): |
MARTINS, Alice Fátima
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Mestrado em Cultura Visual
|
| Departamento: |
Processos e Sistemas Visuais, Educação e Visualidade
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2772
|
Resumo: |
Currently, School is one of those places where meaning about daily life is produced through cultural practices, concepts and values. Therefore, the aim of this investigation is the development of a number of artistic learning, amid technical images, specially the eletroeletronic ones of the origin of cinema. In this study the main motivational aspect was the possibility of learning from imagery modalities. In this regard, a number of different ways of learning, involving the visual narratives of Lumiére Brothers as well as George Méliès were planned and developed by me with a group of second grade students at a public state High School in the suburb of Goiânia. The students also produced their visual works discussing problems faced in the daily relations established among students and educators. As reflection on this educational practice, the students, the tutors and I watched and discussed the short films produced by the students of room B guided by the methodological processes of visual culture. Therefore, we discussed and reached conclusions on these narratives mediated by the following questions: What do these images allow us to think? , What relations can we establish and what do they tell about us? Among other arisen questions the students visual narratives caused a diversity of feelings and interpretations about relations of power established in the core of the field-school as well as showing the absence of dialogue, interaction and hearing in the processes of teaching and learning. Finally, for the students, the attention, dialogue and the possibility of complaining about their problems became an alternative for them to be heard. For me, dialogue, action and reflection of the same actions within the context of my pedagogical practice were some of the main concepts in which, we, the people linked to this investigation could experience in a field-school. |
