Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Kamilla Cristina da Cunha
 |
Orientador(a): |
Moraes, Ângela Teixeira de
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Moraes, Ângela Teixeira de,
Lima, Angelita Pereira de,
Machado, Liliane Maria Macedo |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Comunicação (FIC)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Informação e Comunicação - FIC (RG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10595
|
Resumo: |
Femicide is a heinous crime derived from a continuum of violence, practiced against women intentionally, for misogynistic reasons. This practice is a serious human rights’ violation and one of the main obstacles to the exercise of full women’s citizenship. This research intended to understand how the printed newspaper O Popular constructs its journalistic discourse on the women’s murder, after Law nº. 13.104/2015, also known as the Law of Femicide, in order to identify the points where discursive changes have taken place and how they are being released in the cover stories on the murder of women for gender issues. The main authors that permeate this research are: Scott (1995), Teles (2017), Blay (2008) and Manzini-Covre (1991), when addressing the issues of gender, human rights and women's citizenship; Russell (1992), Corrêa (1981; 1983), Almeida (1998), Carcedo and Sagot (2000) and Romio (2017), when talking about femicide, its typifications and classifications; Traquina (2005), Wolf (2006), Foucault (2019) and Charaudeau (2012), when discussing journalism, its discursive and power strategies in society. The corpus of this research was composed of 37 cover stories that address the murder of women for gender reasons, in the period between 2012 and 2018. For the analysis and discussion of the data, we used Discourse Analysis, from its devices: appeal discursive; interdiscursive; and polyphony. Finally, we identified that the journalistic discourse presents discursive changes after the Feminicide Law, however, it still addresses the issue mainly from a legal and not social or cultural perspective. |