Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Oliveira, João Daniell Ferreira de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Gomes, Suely Henrique de Aquino
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Gomes, Suely Henrique de Aquino,
Santos, Goiamérico Felício Carneiro dos,
Borges, Rafael de Almeida Tavares |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Comunicação (FIC)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Informação e Comunicação - FIC (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/8069
|
Resumo: |
This research proposes a reflection on the relationship between the documentary and the essay film in the film Jogo de Cena (2007) by Brazilian documentary filmmaker Eduardo Coutinho. It is investigated if there is a tension between the analyzed domains in the analyzed film. From this question I seek to understand how the technical and aesthetic choices that constitute Coutinho's style assume essayistic contours in the research object. In order to answer the research question, I aim to understand how Coutinho 's cinematographic style is characterized and constituted; to understand how Jogo de Cena (2007) plays in the tradition of the documentary and to understand how the essay film was constituted and how it can be identified in the cinema. Methodologically, a proposal for the analysis of documents by Francisco Elinaldo Teixeira was adopted in three moments: 1. Inventory of composition materials; 2. Inventory of compositional modes; 3. Reflection on narrative modes and camera functions. Through the analysis it is indicated how it is possible to recognize essayistic strategies in Jogo de Cena (2007) as: the voice of essay tone, the dialectic of materials, the montage between word and image, the heterogeneity of the composition materials, second reading order. Thus, it is concluded that the film studied even belonging to the documentary domain presents a strong essayistic inflexion. |
