Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Teixeira, Lara de Carvalho
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Calil, Francine Neves
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Calil, Francine Neves,
Wander, Alcido Elenor,
Pacheco, Abílio Rodrigues |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronegócio (EA)
|
| Departamento: |
Escola de Agronomia - EA (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11971
|
Resumo: |
The increased demand for food has made Brazil one of the main global players in agribusiness, focusing on the production and export of several agricultural products. Due to the environmental, economic, and social appeal, integrated production systems, such as Crop-Livestock-Forestry Integration, have been considered the future of agriculture. Regarding the economic approach, the system is based on the diversification of income-generating activities, with different moments of revenue entry and reduction of the risk of financial losses. Thus, the objective of this work is to evaluate the economic viability of the second rotation of an Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forestry (ICLF) system and to stimulate the adoption of integrated production systems in other properties based on the success cases of Boa Vereda farm in the municipality of Cachoeira Dourada, in the state of Goiás, central-western region of Brazil. The integrated system is composed of the following crops: soy, corn, forage (Piatã), beef cattle, and eucalyptus. The technical coefficients were obtained at the Boa Vereda farm and the prices used for economic evaluation were obtained from the Institute for the Strengthening of Agriculture in Goiás and in the local market, for the 2020/2021 harvest. The economic indicators used to evaluate the economic viability were the Net Present Value and the Uniform Annual Equivalent Value. It was not possible to use the Internal Rate of Return, due to reports of errors in the calculations, as it did not present negative values in the first years of implementation of the system.The results showed that the integrated system of second rotation is viable for the producer, both for cutting at 6 or 14 years, presenting a return greater than the opportunity cost of land, which shows the attractiveness of the ILPF system. Therefore, this system presents an economically viable alternative, which has other benefits that allow the diversification of revenue sources, with reduced risk, in addition to making the productive area more sustainable. |
