Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Sousa Júnior, Ailton Antônio de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Bakuzis, Andris Figueiroa
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Bakuzis, Andris Figueiroa,
Lima, Emília Celma de Oliveira,
Castro, Marcos Antônio de,
Mendanha Neto, Sebastião Antônio |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisica (IF)
|
| Departamento: |
Instituto de Física - IF (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6892
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of this project is to synthesize and characterize heterostructures composed by manganese ferrite nanoparticles (MnFe2O4 NPs) and gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) able to: 1) respond to external alternating magnetic fields, what would enable their use in cancer diagnostic as contrast agentes for magnetic resonance imaging, as well as in cancer treatment via magnetic hyperthermia; 2) respond to eletromagnetic radiation, what would enable their use in cancer diagnostic as contrast agents for X-ray computed tomography (CT), as well as in cancer treatment via photothermal hyperthermia. We evaluate four MnFe2O4-Au heterostructures synthesis protocols. On Protocol 1, we use part of the energy of a laser beam (808 nm, 800 mW) to promote the nucleation of Au NPs at the surface of previously synthesized MnFe2O4 NPs covered by DMSA (dimercaptosuccinic acid). On Protocol 2, we use part of the energy of an alternating magnetic field (333,8 kHz, 17 mT) to promote this nucleation. We also perform an analysis of the influence of MnFe2O4 NPs covering layer, by comparing the ionic surfactants DMSA and sodium citrate. On Protocols 3 and 4, both the magnetic cores (MnFe2O4 NPs) and the metalic cores (Au NPs) are previously synthesized. Therefore, three Au NPs synthesis methods are evaluated. On Protocol 3, we promote the coupling between Au NPs and MnFe2O4-DMSA NPs using part of the energy from the same laser beam used on Protocol 1. On Protocol 4, we promote the coupling between cysteine-covered Au NPs and lysine-covered MnFe2O4 NPs via peptidic reaction between these two aminoacids. Finally, we conduct a comparative analysis between magnetic and photothermal hyperthermia, proposing a method for the determination of the optical SLP (Specific Loss Power). Moreover, we submit some of our samples to CT imaging. Protocol 1 is the best one in terms of covering the magnetic core by Au NPs. Protocol 2 allows the nucleation of Au NPs with diameters greater than the ones obtained via Protocol 1. Protocols 3 and 4 offer nanostructures with better potential with respect to their use as contrast agents in CT. However, the final yield of all four protocols is very low. Comparing magnetic and photothermal hyperthermia, we verify that the optical SLP is two to three orders of magnitude greater than the magnetic SLP under the assessed conditions, what suggests that protocols using laser beams have more energy available for the nucleation/coupling of Au NPs at the surface of MnFe2O4 NPs than those using alternating magnetic fields or simple heating on hot plate. |
