A política de educação de jovens e adultos e educação profissional em Goiás: tranças desencadeadas com o proeja

• Ano de defesa: 2011
• Autor(a) principal: GARCIA, Lénin Tomazett
• Orientador(a): MACHADO, Maria Margarida
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Educação
• Departamento: Ciências Humanas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Educação de Jovens e Adultos- Educação Profissional- Política Educacional; 1.Educação de Jovens e Adultos-Goias 2. Educação profissional 3. Política Educacional
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Youth and Adult-Education-Vocational Education Policy
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2003

This research investigates the implementation of the National Programme of Integration of Professional Education with Basic Education in the Mode of Education Youth and Adults (Proeja) in the state of Goiás. Has as goal the classic studies in the context of educational policy: the establishment of a federal program in state schools. Problematizes the tension among continuity and rupture developed from the tracks and illuminates the Proeja quest to unravel the meanings of this program for the state of Goias, especially highlighted by the struggle to ensure access to education as a social right noun. The methodological tools used to biographical and documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with professionals involved in program implementation. The theoretical support that based the analysis of the object studied was historical and dialectical materialism, identifying the contradictory aspects of the proposition of a public policy in the context of economic materiality, focused on maintaining the lack of access to education for all. The analysis revealed a tension between establishment and implementation of the Programme. The regulatory and legal actions are completed, but the program is not done effectively, the process that engenders this determination, restores the questioning about the functionality of this program as a way of resolving conflicts and social inequalities. This functionality is the limit of the program itself, and outlines its defensive character against the fundamental contradiction of capital, which organizes our current system of social metabolism.