Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
Autor(a) principal: |
PECIN, Diego Galindo
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Orientador(a): |
LONGO, Humberto José
![lattes](/bdtd/themes/bdtd/images/lattes.gif?_=1676566308) |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Mestrado em Ciência da Computação
|
Departamento: |
Ciências Exatas e da Terra - Ciências da Computação
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/528
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation addresses the optimization of the Elementary Shortest Path Problem with a Capacity Constraint (ESPPCC) and describes algorithms for its resolution that make use of concepts such as Label-Setting, Bidirectional Dynamic Programming and Decremental State Space Relaxation. These algorithms were used in a robust CVRP s Branch-and- Cut-and-Price framework as the column generation mechanism. The resulting BCP was used to obtain results (lower bounds, processing time and the number of branching nodes generated) to several CVRP s test instances. These results are compared with previous ones obtained with the original BCP, which is based on k-cycle elimination. Elementary routes are also explored in a route enumeration context, which allows the enumeration of all possible relevant elementary routes, i.e., all routes that have a chance of being part of an optimal CVRP s solution. If the number of relevant routes is not too large (say, in the range of tenths of thousands), the overall problem may be solved by feeding a general MIP solver with a set-partition formulation containing only those routes. If this set-partition can be solved, the optimal solution will be found and no branch will be necessary. Sometimes this leads to very significant speedups when compared to traditional branch strategies. |