Lugar é laço: o saber profundo nas comunidades goianas de Cibele e Caiçara

• Ano de defesa: 2006
• Autor(a) principal: ARAÚJO, Maria Emília Carvalho de
• Orientador(a): PESSOA, Jadir de Morais
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Educação
• Departamento: Ciências Humanas
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Saber profundo, Camponeses, Antropologia da educação
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Deep knowing, Country people, Anthropology of education.
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2138

Deep knowing is the conceptual matrix of this reflection, based on the agreement of that the process to learn and to teach is not restricted to the school, neither is exclusive fruit of the scientific rationality. For communities to know deep the citizens of the towns of Cibele and Caiçara are called, small agroupments of people near to the city of Itapuranga. The topofilies of knowing are the houses, churches, markets, locus of that pedagogical, verticalized essence of learning and teaching, underground in the collective memory of a community. In it I appeal to the depth knowing of the prayers and blessings, of the chore in cultivated filds and the houses, and of imaginary passes through, is that this study, established is placed theoretically in the Daily one from Michel Maffesoli, Manoel Barbosa and Jose Carlos de Paula Carvalho, who drinks in the source of the Deep Anthopology of Gilbert Durand and of the Paradigm of the Complexity of Edgar Morin. The study it is also based on Cliford Geertz, searching the said one of these primitive-next , dionisíacs citizens of blackfiels studied by Maria Isaura Pereira de Queiroz, Antonio Candido, Jose de Sousa Martins, Carlos Rodrigues Brandão and, more recently, for Jadir de Morais Pessoa. Modernity in its to know connoisseur if strangles, suspicion of a rational universe that falls down in the certainty of knowing them old, deep of the collective memory. This study, finally, it opens doors for a dialogue between anthropology, sociology, psychology and pedagogia. This to compose in depth has in the center the man and its imaginary one, the genetic and fenotípic system, the partner-cultural complex, beams of one all, neglected for the rational utilitarian knowledge of the modern times.