Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2020 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Oliveira, Daniel Lucas de Jesus
 |
Orientador(a): |
Silva, Maria da Conceição
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Silva, Maria da Conceição,
Teixeira, Rafael Saddi,
Nicolini, Cristiano,
Silva, Vânia Cristina da,
Almeida, Vasni de |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em História (FH)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de História - FH (RG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/12325
|
Resumo: |
The present thesis investigated the militarization process of public education in Goiás and its relation to the concrete interests of class fractions. We identified the need for a reading of the theme beyond traditional educational conceptions. The objective was to access and understand the main motivations, interests and the meaning of the search of families that resort to the conditions offered by the militarized school administration model. To this end, we resorted to the concepts, categories, and arguments of Christian Laval, Jessé Souza, Pierre Bourdieu, among others. Based on the thought of the Russian anarchist Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876) we concentrate our efforts to establish a materialist reading of militarization. The method applied is of an interdisciplinary nature in the composition of a historical and sociological analysis of the object investigated. From a multiplicity of sources and the application of instruments, we have observed multiple determinations that drive the demand for military colleges. In this study we found a set of contradictions between the pro-militarization arguments and the reality of the process. However, even in contradictory terms the dynamics of militarization connects with concrete interests of individuals, indicating that the search is not reduced to the political and ideological aspect, but also for pragmatic purposes. In this sense, we believe that the research proposes a change of emphasis and focus in approaches to the subject, as well as the need for debate. |