Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lacerda, Lidia Neira Alves
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pechincha, Mônica Thereza Soares
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Barreto Filho, Henyo Trindade,
Tavares, Francisco Mata Machado |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Antropologia Social (FCS)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/10215
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation presents a description and analysis of the state actions related to Civil Public Action n. 20063903000711-8, judged by Brazilian Federal Prosecution Service (MPF), concerning Belo Monte plant construction. It focuses on the controversy arising the absence of previous consultations or hearings, as determined by Convention n. 169 and Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988. Using the concepts of governmentality and commensurability, this study intends to analyse discursive representation and state matters which were used to make possible the construction of Belo Monte plant, even in disagreement with what is found in the current indigenous law. As a result of this, we also look into the interpretation of legal mechanisms, which prevented indigenous people participation, and their effective citizenship and authonomy, in opposite to a multiethnic state. |
