Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Lemes, João Vitor Martins
 |
Orientador(a): |
Silva, Joana Aparecida Fernandes da
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Silva, Joana Aparecida Fernandes da,
Oliveira, Alessandro Roberto de,
Herbetta, Alexandre Ferraz,
Moreira, Erika Macedo,
Tárrega, Maria Cristina Vidotte Blanco |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Antropologia Social (FCS)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11715
|
Resumo: |
The identities and territorialities of traditional nations and communities are recent guarantees in Brazil. Only with the 1988 Democratic Constitution begin substantive movements to repair the processes of subjugation/ exclusion/ marginalization to which these subjects were subjected. Furthermore, despite being clearly guaranteed in the post-88 legal system, on the material plane these identities and territorialities are not effectively guaranteed, due to the State's difficulty in understanding and internalizing the categories under which the lives of these groups are based, especially in the context of conflicts for land that development processes impose on a daily basis and that directly impact the ways of doing, living and creating of these groups. Taking into account the mismatch generated by the lack of understanding of cultural diversities in state political and legal processes and assuming that the contributions of anthropological reports in court proceedings point out new possibilities in the sense of overcoming the obstacles imposed by modern law to guarantee rights based on diversity, this thesis proposes to reflect on how anthropological reports contribute to the legitimacy of these subjects' rights by inserting subsidies so that legal decisions on the lives of these human groups respect their sociocultural dynamics as much as possible. |