Análise multidimensional do preparo de canais radiculares curvos com instrumentos de níquel-titânio em rotação contínua e reciprocante

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2016
Autor(a) principal: Mamede Neto, Iussif lattes
Orientador(a): Estrela, Carlos lattes
Banca de defesa: Estrela, Carlos, Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves de, Decurcio , Daniel de Almeida, Borges, Álvaro Henrique, Pécora, Jesus Djalma
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)
Departamento: Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6685
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate transportation (T) and centering ability (CA) of root canal preparations using continuous or reciprocating nickel-titanium endodontic files. Material and methods: Ninety-six mesiobuccal root canals of mandibular first and second molars were randomly divide into 6 groups (n=16) according to the rotary file used: Group 1- ProTaper Next®; Group 2- ProTaper Gold®; Group 3- Mtwo®; Group 4- BioRaCe®; Group 5- WaveOne Gold®; Group 6- Reciproc®. Root canals were prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained before and after canal preparation. Measurements were made at five different points: 2, 3 and 4 mm from the apex and 2, 3 and 4 mm below furcation. Transportation and centering ability were analyzed following the recommendations made by Gambill et al. (1996). Results: The greatest mesiodistal (MD) transportation (T) was found for Reciproc® files (p<0.05), and the greatest buccolingual (BL) T, for Reciproc®, ProTaper Gold® and ProTaper Next® files (p<0.05). The greatest mesiodistal (MD) centering ability (CA) was found for BioRaCe® files (p<0.05), and the greatest buccolingual (BL) CA, for BioRaCe® and Mtwo® files (p<0.05). Conclusion: All systems produced root canal transportation. No file system achieved perfect CA of root preparation. Reciproc® files had the greatest MD T and BL T. BioRaCe® files had the greatest MD CA, whereas BL CA was similar for BioRaCe® and Mtwo® files.