Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Mamede Neto, Iussif
 |
Orientador(a): |
Estrela, Carlos
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Estrela, Carlos,
Alencar, Ana Helena Gonçalves de,
Decurcio , Daniel de Almeida,
Borges, Álvaro Henrique,
Pécora, Jesus Djalma |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6685
|
Resumo: |
Objective: To evaluate transportation (T) and centering ability (CA) of root canal preparations using continuous or reciprocating nickel-titanium endodontic files. Material and methods: Ninety-six mesiobuccal root canals of mandibular first and second molars were randomly divide into 6 groups (n=16) according to the rotary file used: Group 1- ProTaper Next®; Group 2- ProTaper Gold®; Group 3- Mtwo®; Group 4- BioRaCe®; Group 5- WaveOne Gold®; Group 6- Reciproc®. Root canals were prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained before and after canal preparation. Measurements were made at five different points: 2, 3 and 4 mm from the apex and 2, 3 and 4 mm below furcation. Transportation and centering ability were analyzed following the recommendations made by Gambill et al. (1996). Results: The greatest mesiodistal (MD) transportation (T) was found for Reciproc® files (p<0.05), and the greatest buccolingual (BL) T, for Reciproc®, ProTaper Gold® and ProTaper Next® files (p<0.05). The greatest mesiodistal (MD) centering ability (CA) was found for BioRaCe® files (p<0.05), and the greatest buccolingual (BL) CA, for BioRaCe® and Mtwo® files (p<0.05). Conclusion: All systems produced root canal transportation. No file system achieved perfect CA of root preparation. Reciproc® files had the greatest MD T and BL T. BioRaCe® files had the greatest MD CA, whereas BL CA was similar for BioRaCe® and Mtwo® files. |