Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lemes, Maria Madalena Del Duqui
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Bachion, Maria Márcia
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Lemes, Maria Madalena Del Duqui
,
Barbosa, Dulce Aparecida,
Brasil, Virgínia Visconde,
Munari, Denize Bouttelet,
Almeida, Miriam de Abreu |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Enfermagem (FEN)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Enfermagem - FEN (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6140
|
Resumo: |
INTRODUCTION: Among the health problems experienced by adult and elderly people, who have a strong impact on the quality of life, stands out chronic kidney disease (CKD). The nursing process improves the clinical practice of care in hemodialysis, however, is still in its infancy and the scope of the phenomenas described in the taxonomies of diagnoses, interventions and nursing results, as the focus on hemodialysis scenario has not yet been described. OBJECTIVES: To validate nursing diagnoses as priorities by expert nurses; Validate interventions for diagnosis identified as priority by expert nurses; Validate relevant nursing results for diagnoses identified as priority by expert nurses. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive, cross-sectional study, validation of nursing diagnoses, interventions and priority outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis people, from the NANDA-I Terminology / NIC / NOC. Participated 12 hemodialysis units that served 1788 patients and 55 nurses working. From the occupational profile of these nurses was identified 21 experts. Of these, nine validated diagnoses, interventions and nursing outcomes, through a focus group, for people with chronic kidney disease. RESULTS: There were 36 validated diagnostic, 124 interventions and 119 nursing results. Of validated nursing diagnoses, 13 are recognized more often in literature and 23, little mentioned or not mentioned. CONCLUSION: The diagnoses, interventions and nursing outcomes validated by experts in hemodialysis give visibility to a qualified clinical practice proposal for systematization of nursing care in accordance with the reality of unity. |
