Efeitos colaterais do aparelho intraoral de avanço mandibular em pacientes com e sem implantes osseointegrados

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2023
Autor(a) principal: Viana, Franciny Castiglioni
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
BR
Mestrado em Ciências Odontológicas
Centro de Ciências da Saúde
UFES
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Odontológicas
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/12719
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Mandibular advancement appliances (MAD) are effective for the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), however dental and skeletal side effects are limiting factors for treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of MAD (modified PM Positioner Type II) in the treatment of OSA and to compare alterations in dental and skeletal positioning resulting from long-term use of MAD, using cephalometric radiographs in patients with and without osseointegrated implants. METHODOLOGY: The sample was collected in a database, cephalometric analyses, anthropometric and polysomnographic parameters of 44 patients with mild, moderate and severe OSA were evaluated before and after an average of 59 months of use of the MAD. The sample was statistically evaluated using a generalized linear model by comparing measurements between groups, the adopted significance level was 5%. RESULTS: No significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between the groups with and without osseointegrated implants in terms of improvement in polysomnographic parameters and side effects of dental and skeletal origin. CONCLUSION: The PM Positioner Type II proved to be effective in the treatment of OSA in terms of improving polysomnographic parameters in patients with and without osseointegrated implants. Changes in dental and skeletal positioning after using the MAD were similar between both groups during the study period.