Dissidências em curso : transicionando gêneros nos currículos e nas práticas discursivas em psicologia
Ano de defesa: | 2017 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
BR Mestrado em Psicologia Institucional UFES Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Institucional |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/9009 |
Resumo: | The triggers questions of this research refer to the normalizations regarding the knowledge about sexualities and dissenting genders and to the games of truth that accompany them, in the constitution of speeches that legitimize psychology as a disciplinary field aligned with the medical pathologizing discourses of counterhegemonic subjectivities. From these initial problematizations, we seek the proposal of a research-intervention in the field of psychology curricula and of the processes of subjectivation in the production of these discourses and knowledge about sexualities and gender. We believe that other regimes of truth can be constructed by refuting the privilege of these academic speeches in relation to modes of production of knowledge that emerge from the activism and experiences of gender dissidence. However, we´re still proposing the production of speeches in academic field, which we affirm as a strategic field, insofar as we are called to ethical-aesthetic-political positions and implications that are articulated to other social activism and movements. We are among the studies of the processes of subjectivation, in reference to the statements of Foucault (2004) regarding a political production of the discourses and the subjects of knowledge, as well as their processes of objectification, since we will deal with power relations in the constitution Of the knowledge that is articulated, in the device of sexuality, as a legitimized object in the field of psychology. Therefore, we are disposed to research movements in which tensioning interests us - wherein discursive practices are challenged and articulated in the games of truth that authorize and expropriate knowledge in psychology. The institutional analysis focuses on the constitution of this field, making possible this mobility of a cartographic course, in which analyzers and implications are placed as devices of a research-intervention. In this shifting field, in which we seek to transition (or to transpose), we recognize a place authorized to psychology, in which a true discourse on sexualities and gender is demanded, legitimized by the status of science - which responds to the subjects' intimacy issues. This enunciating position, which a priori normalizes multiple and diverse experiences of itself, will be discussed in the production of curricula in psychology, in their tensions and confluences with expressions of sexual and gender dissidence, composing narratives that are stitched together in collective paths and feminist activism, and LGBT's. In the transversality of these paths, the text proliferates itself by analyzing of the lived implications, among which we compose the narratives of this dissertation, a question of a search, even if incipient, of the gender dissidence as the place of a non-man, by decolonization of the epistemic subject. |