Elites políticas espírito-santenses e reformismo autoritário (1930-1937)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2005
Autor(a) principal: Achiamé, Fernando Antonio de Moraes
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
BR
Mestrado em História
UFES
Programa de Pós-Graduação em História
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/3485
Resumo: This dissertation is engaged in an analysis of the historical process of the 1930 Revolution in the State of Espírito Santo, and its political developments as far as 1937. It employs the theoretical apparatus devised by Antonio Gramsci as well as works by historians who have dealt with this issue in a Brazilian scope. It surveys the construction of the state in such aspects as territorial appropriation, economic organization, and social structuring, with an emphasis on the ‘20s and ‘30s. It compares world ideologies current during the first half of the 20th century to Brazilian politics in the period under analysis. It seeks to understand the oligarchic system extant in the First Republic so as to explain the scheme driving the revolutionary movement in the State and the implementation of the new regime as regards the commitment of local political elites. It interprets the activities of the João Punaro Bley administration both in sponsoring a financial recovery and a political and administrative centralization in terms of autocratic reforms. In the light of this situation, it deals with the preservation of revolutionary “spirit” and the creation of a personality cult surrounding the governmental leader. It deals with the reorganization and creation of Gramscian “parties” and surveys clashes for power occurring in a period of restricted democracy. As a conclusion it enhances the conservative pattern imprinted on the political activity during these years at the State level so as to prevent reforms carried out in social sectors from interfering with economic privileges of dominant classes, which were supposed to be preserved.