Matemática Aplicada às Escolhas Sociais: um protótipo para decisões justas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Lennon da Rocha
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
Brasil
Centro de Ciências Exatas e Naturais - CCEN
UFERSA
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Matemática
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufersa.edu.br/handle/prefix/6973
Resumo: Democratic political systems have as basic condition to use the majority opinion to force it society. Several mathematical models have become indispensable to the Social Sciences. One of the most important and present today is the study of the fair vote, a coherent means of making democratic decisions, reflecting the will of a majority. Suffrage, the right to vote and to be voted, has always been one of the deepest universal problems, but the process of fairness of choices has taken a long time to obtain mathematical treatment with consistent theorems and propositions about how to make a full election, from initial conditions rigorous. We will give an analysis of the history of the vote and the ideas developed by two Frenchmen who have researched hard and honestly what would be the most honest way to choose their representatives in the so-called majority elections today. In the second part of the investigation, we will show studies by famous Americans on how to make a proportional election coherent, in what concerns the division of vacancies, where trial and error is the scientific method used in most cases. In the end, we will give an exposition of the models adopted in the Brazilian elections and, intuitively, we will draw a parallel with all the work and how the processes listed are correct or misleading, regarding the application of the best means of social choices