Scientific collaboration networks from Lattes database: topology, dynamics and gender statistics

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Eduardo Barbosa
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: eng
• Palavras-chave em Português: Redes de colaboração; Redes complexas; Teoria dos grafos; Redes sociais; Publicações científicas; Social network analysis
• Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/18489

Understanding the dynamics of research production and collaboration may reveal better strategies for scientific careers, academic institutions and funding agencies. Here we propose the use of a large and multidisciplinary database of scientific curricula in Brazil, namely, the Lattes Platform, to study patterns of scientific production and collaboration. Detailed information about publications and researchers is available in this database. Individual curricula are submitted by the researchers themselves so that co-authorship is unambiguous. Researchers can be evaluated by scientific productivity, geographical location and field of expertise. Our results show that the collaboration network is growing exponentially for the last three decades, with a distribution of number of collaborators per researcher that approaches a power-law as the network gets older. Moreover, both the distributions of number of collaborators and production per researcher obey power-law behaviors, regardless of the geographical location or field, suggesting that the same universal mechanism might be responsible for network growth and productivity. We also show that the collaboration network under investigation displays a typical assortative mixing behavior, where teeming researchers (i.e., with high degree) tend to collaborate with others alike. Moreover, we discover that on average men prefer collaborating with other men than with women, while women are more egalitarian. This is consistently observed over all fields and essentially independent on the number of collaborators of the researcher. The solely exception is for engineering, where clearly this gender bias is less pronounced, when the number of collaborators increases. We also find that the distribution of number of collaborators follows a power-law, with a cut-off that is gender dependent. This reflects the fact that on average men produce more papers andhave more collaborators than women. We also find that both genders display the same tendency towards interdisciplinary collaborations, except for Exact and Earth Sciences, where women having many collaborators are more open to interdisciplinary research.