Linfoma não-Hodgkin difuso de grandes células B : características clínicas, tratamento e prognóstico com os esquemas quimioterápicos CHOP e CHOP-Bleo

• Ano de defesa: 2006
• Autor(a) principal: Mota, Sandra Mara Brasileiro
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Linfoma não Hodgkin; Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B; Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica
• Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/4269

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL) corresponds to 50% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (LNH). Their treatment of choice is the association chemotherapy, in special the CHOP therapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) considered the standard treatment initial of the DLBCL. Variations of this therapy, with the CHOP-Bleo protocol (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) have been used with the intention of obtaining complete response rates for the patients. In Brazil, little is known about the incidence, clinical behavior, response to therapy and survival of the patients with DLBCL. This study aimed to set out the epidemiological profile of patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphomas, who received medical care at Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio (HUWC), outline in Ceará state, with the first attendment from January 1989 to December 2003, who the used the CHOP and/or CHOP-Bleo therapy; Evaluating the security and efficiency of the protocols proposed by analysis of the kind of therapeutical response, clinical and laboratorial outcomes of these patients. The data collection was performed from medical recording of the 31 patients analyzed. These, 21 (67,74%) were the men and 10 (32,26%) women. The average age was 45,81 ± 16,3 anos. Agriculturists represented 25,82% (8/31) of all patients. The stage III the Ann Arbor classification were the most frequent (32,26%), but only 45% of the patients had B symptoms. The values of lactate dehydrogenises (LDH) enzyme were elevated in 49% of the patients at diagnosis, but in 16% of the patients these values at diagnosis were unknown. As much as the IPI, 71% were classified as an IPI low and intermediate risk, 13% as an IPI intermediate-high risk, none of the study patients showed as an IPI high risk and 16% there is not possible the classification to establish due to the data is unknown. As much as the chemotherapy protocols used, 58% (18/31) of the patients was received CHOP chemotherapy, 36% (11/31) CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy and 6% (2/31) received CHOP associated with CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy. Among the patients who used CHOP chemotherapy, 78% was achieving complete response (CR), 17% was achieving relapse of the disease and only 5% were the death. In the group who used CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy, 63% was achieving RC, 18% was achieving relapse of the disease and 19% died. The 2 patients who used CHOP and CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy were achieving relapse of the disease. The values of the LDH after chemotherapy showed decreased in patients with RC as much as the relapsed patients. We verified that the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not influenced by the clinic stage and initial values of the LDH patients. The logistic regression did not show statistical differences when the complete response was analyzed comparing to outcomes the studied variables after QT, except for the proportion of reduction of LDH levels and response to the treatment. The results stress the security and efficiency of the protocols CHOP e CHOP-Bleo in our study population. The data obtained also the need epidemiological studies in different DLBCL populations for the security in the choice chemotherapy, well as standardized the classification and description of the DLBCL and prognoses factures by pathologists and oncologists.