Julgar e compreender: contradições da abordagem multiprofissional a família da criança envenenada

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2001
Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Luiza Jane Eyre de Souza
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/66163
Resumo: To take care respecting the holistic philosophy, this care requests, on the part of the health professional, philosophical and epistemological bases. It is necessary, to insert in the people the common sense of who takes care in the planning and execution of the own care, and in that process, to notice the interrelation with the educating caring the human being. This research had as objective to understand how the health professionals nurse, doctor, physiotherapist and social worker, they approach the situation of the poisoned child's family and which are the implicatdns of that approach for the practice of the care in health. Opting for the ethnography, prioritizing the etnonursing method, in the theoretical-methodological construction. Were interviewed, intentionally, nineteen professionals that deveiop their practice in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, of an emergency public hospital, located in the city of Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. Due to the analysis of the describers and patterns that qualified the professional approach to the poisoned child's family, the cultural theme of the study emerged was To Judge and to understand: contradictíons of the approach of the team multiprofissional to the poisoned child's family. These findings were reflected to the light of the Theory of the Cultural Care and, by means of the revealed desires through the participants of the study, was identified indications of a dialogical practice, contradictory in itself, however with harmony in the respect to the differences, coming from the diversity of academic formations and world visions of each professional, besides the changes that come from the reflex of the organizational structure in which that practice is exercised.