Imunoexpressão da Caderina-E nas cervicites, nas lesões intraepiteliais escamosas e no carcinoma invasor do colo uterino

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Cavalcante, José Roosivelt
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Palavras-chave em Português: Caderinas; Neoplasia Intraepitelial Cervical
• Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6589

Cervical cancer is one of the most important public health problems around the world. About 17.540 new cases are expected, in Brazil, for 2013. Actually, it’s believed that the majority of cervical cancers begin with non invasive dysplastic lesions, the cervical intraepithelial neoplasias. The acquisition of invasive properties, in epithelial malignancies, is associated to the disruption of intercellular adhesions. The adhesion molecules play a pivotal role in these intercellular bindings and E-cadherin is considered one of the most important among them. In normal epithelial tissues its presence in cell membrane is recognized and it was shown that a down regulation of these proteins in the majority of solid tumors may contribute to facilitate the invasive process. The aim, of this research, was to investigate the E-cadherin immunoexpression in cervicitis, in SILs and in the invasive carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Samples specimens consisted of 83 cases of uterine cervical biopsies and conizations retrieved from the Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine files of the Federal University of Ceará (Brazil) in 2007 and 2010, distributed, by diagnostic, as follows: Cervicitis = 8 cases; Low Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) = 24 cases; High Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) = 28 cases; and Invasive Carcinoma = 23 cases. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with the anti-E-cadherin monoclonal antibody and it was considered positive the membranar expression, and, negative, the absence of membranar expression. The Fisher’s exact test was the choice for the contingency tables calculations. The immunostaining results were: Cervicitis = (12%) negative and 7/8 (88%) positive cases to E-cadherin; LSILs = 7/24 (29%) negative cases and 17/24 (71%) positive; HSILs = 7/28 (25%) negative and 21/28 (75%) positive; Invasive Carcinoma = 19/23 (83%) negative and 4/23 (17%) positive. The negative expression was much more frequent in SILs (27%) when compared to cervicitis (12%), although no significant difference (p = 0,6657). In SILs, a bigger E-cadherin loss was noted in undifferentiated cells at the basal third of epithelial thickness. Finally it was shown that the absence of E-cadherin membranar expression was much more frequent in the uterine cervix invasive carcinoma when compared to LSILs and HSILs. These data showed the E-cadherin importance in cervical carcinogenesis, nonetheless, several aspects remain without explication and new researches are to be performed.