Expressão diferencial de genes circadianos em ratos Wistar e em modelo experimental de epilepsia do lobo temporal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Evelin Antonieli da Silva
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Alagoas
Brasil
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde
UFAL
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://www.repositorio.ufal.br/handle/riufal/4580
Resumo: The molecular mechanisms underlying epileptogenesis have been widely investigated by differential gene expression approach, especially RT-qPCR methodology. However, controversial findings highlight the occurrence of unpredictable sources of variance in the experimental designs. Here, we investigated if daily rhythms of transcript’s levels may impact on differential gene expression analysis in hippocampus of epileptic rats. For this, we have selected six core clock genes (Per1, Per3, Bmal1, Clock, Cry1 and Cry2), whose rhythmic expression pattern in hippocampus had been previously reported. Initially, we identified Tubb2a/Rplp1 and Tubb2a/Ppia as suitable normalizers for circadian studies in hippocampus of rats maintained to 12:12 hour light:dark (LD) cycle. Next, we confirmed the temporal profiling of Per1, Per3, Bmal1, Cry1 and Cry2 mRNA levels in the hippocampus of naïve rats by both Acrophase and CircWave statistical tests for circadian analysis. We showed that temporal differences of sampling can change experimental results for Per1, Per3, Bmal1, Cry1 and Cry2, but not for Clock, which was consistently decreased in epileptic rats in all comparison to the naive group. Finally, we observed that Gfap showed daily variation of transcript levels, and once again the differences in the times of the experiments influence the results. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that daily oscillation can lead to erroneous conclusions in gene expression analysis in hippocampus of epileptic rats. Investigators, therefore, should be aware that genes with circadian expression could be out of phase in different animals of experimental and control groups. Moreover, our results indicate that a sub-expression of Clock may be involved in epileptogenicity, although the functional significance of this remains to be investigated.