Atuação e contribuição dos conselhos municipais de desenvolvimento rural sustentável nos municípios da AMUSEP (Associação dos Municípios do Setentrião Paranaense)

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Zulian, Egberto
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual de Maringá; Brasil; Departamento de Ciências Sociais; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Políticas Públicas; UEM; Maringá, PR; Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes
• Palavras-chave em Português: Conselho Municipal de desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável; Atuação; Funcionamento; Contribuição; Conselho Gestor; Políticas de desenvolvimento rural; Políticas públicas; Gestão democrática; Associação dos Municípios do Setentrião Paranaense (AMUSEP); Norte do Paraná; Brasil.; Municipal Council of Sustainable Rural Development; Management Council; Rural Development Policies; Public Policies; Democratic Management; Brazil.; Ciências Humanas; Ciência Política
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/3982

The aim of this work was to make a wide diagnosis of the rural managers councilors performance in thirty towns in the north of Paraná State. In the study there is a historical of the many managers councilors, their performance and the problems faced when accomplishing their objectives. Such historical study allowed a comparative analysis among rural and non-rural managers councilors, revealing that the problems and difficulties faced by these two types are similar. The rural managers councilors from Paraná and from the studied area started in 1983. In 1989 it was widened to attend a state program with Mundial Bank resources, named Rural Paraná, later transformed into 12 Months Paraná Council, in 1998. Then, it was transformed into Municipal Council of Sustainable Rural Development (CMDRS). Like this, in 2000 and 2001 the actors involved started to receive various ways of enabling, that lasted until the current year (2012). It led the research to the aim of answering if this continued training brought any positive difference on CMDRSs performance. To that, a study was made between 2011/12 in which the same items used to analyze a CMDRS group in 2001 were analyzed. Concerning this query, the work shows that there was little improvement, despite the experience and training for more than ten years. Also in order to measure CMDRS contribution to the development of the thirty towns studied, an interview was made with the 30 majors, official rural extension technicians and all council presidents of the studied towns. To conclude, the research identified the institutionalizing degree and the features of the councis work, and also how the representative and participation are, how the decision dynamic is, what the councs involvement level is, what the difficulties to accomplish their objectives are, and what factors explain the rural council (CMDRS)s absence in some towns.