Discurso bíblico : o arrostamento de duas formações discursivas distintas

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Zago, Luana Cimatti
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual de Maringá; Brasil; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras; UEM; Maringá, PR; Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes
• Palavras-chave em Português: Análise do discurso; Discurso religioso; Homogeneidade; Heterogeneidade; Discurso bíblico; Formação discursiva; Brasil.; Discursive formation; Religious discourse; Homogeneity; Heterogeneity; Brazil.; Linguística, Letras e Artes; Letras
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/4087

The purpose of this research is to read a set of biblical texts in the Old and the New Testament, mainly, in the four Gospels, namely, Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John,,in order to perform a comparison of two distinct discursive formations (DFs) in the religious discourse, one related to the Jewish discourse, and the other, to the discourse of Jesus Christ. The religious discourse has a constituent character (MAINGUENEAU, 2006) and, for this reason, presents enunciations whose legitimacy is granted by its own enunciative nature. This paper aims to identify the antagonistic/polemical relations, as well as the intersection points between them, considering the ideological contradictions that, concomitantly, connect and separate them. The DF concept used here is based on Pêcheux and anchored to the theory of Courtine (2006, 2009), who comprehends DF not as a homogenous block, but as a unity divided in itself and haunted by its antagonists. Both the enunciations attributed to the Jews and to Jesus Christ are constituted taking into account the regrouping of the already-said DFs, which are supported by distinct discursive traditions. The discourse of Jesus Christ appears as the haunting antagonist to the Jewish DF. This antagonism happens, chiefly, due to the different "messianic subject form" shown by the DFs. The Messiah of the Jewish DF is profoundly presented as earthly-political, with the function of annihilating the enemies, whereas the Messiah of the Christian DF is transcendental, with the mission of bringing forgiveness for the sins. The analysis demonstrates that the discourse of the subject of the Christian DF, having embraced a divine subject position, is revealed as the one who cannot or must not be said in the Jewish DF. The homogeneity between the two DFs can be corroborated in the repeatability of elements of the religious discourse and of the discursive memory; the heterogeneity, on the other hand, happens not only in terms of contrast between the physical and the spiritual, the material and the transcendental, the earthly and the celestial aspects, but also in terms of ideological confrontation and conflict.