A logospirataria como fator de insegurança pública

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Leite, Yuri Bindá
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade do Estado do Amazonas
Brasil
UEA
PROGRAMA DE MESTRADO EM SEGURANÇA PÚBLICA, CIDADANIA E DIREITOS HUMANOS
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://ri.uea.edu.br/handle/riuea/1530
Resumo: Brazil has never invested so much in Public Security as in 2019, there were a huge 95 billion reais in the sector. However, the crime statistics, in the year 2020, showed a rise in homicides. Amid the antagonism of increased resources versus the escalation of violence, Logospiracy is introduced, which in its strict sense is the phenomenon of violation of the normative system; already in a broad sense, it is the destruction of cultures; it is the destruction of peoples and the usurpation of knowledge. The question then arises: How does Logospiracy work as a factor of public insecurity? It does so through corruption, disinformation, the withdrawal of fundamental rights from the population. It is explained, the anti-logos takes advantage of the chaos to implant its selfish goals; to this end, it misrepresents information through Fake News and steals public coffers, in such a way that it expands fear and leaves the population vulnerable to its ideas, minimizing the people's labor rights and individual freedoms. In this way, it benefits entrepreneurs, increases inequalities and leverages violence. To clarify the theme, the research will use exploratory methodological support with journalistic and bibliographic support. The work will be divided into three parts, the first being aimed at deepening the main concepts that guide the theme, the second to address disinformation and the third will present Logospitaria as a factor of public insecurity and the intervention suggested by the author to alleviate the problem.