Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Castro, Lucimara Cristina de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Fernandes, Célia Bassuma
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras (Mestrado)
|
| Departamento: |
Unicentro::Departamento de Letras
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/73
|
Resumo: |
Traditionally thought of as cell of society, is within the family that we are born, we constitute ourselves as subjects and die. She is also the first institution that determines what we can say / do within the social formation in which we operate. In this work, the discursive bias, we understand it as a political institution, in which (competitors) live subjects who occupy different positions and that it means. To be located in urban areas, this institution means because of their status as symbolic existence, as the subject`s body and the body of the city overlap forming one. The organizers of the urban space are home (private sector) and street (public domain), elements marked by relations of opposition and complementarity. The public, common space in the political life of the city, equals the subjects without considering the peculiar existing relations in the private domain, that is, what is proper to the subject, the house and therefore the family. However, the laws that are "control" practices in accordance with the ideology of that social formation, but would have no meaning if there were no subjects and therefore families to discipline, to control. Based on these considerations, this paper aims at bias of French Discourse Analysis, as proposed by Pêcheux, France and Orlandi, in Brazil, and his group of researchers, analyzing six materiality that have circulated on the Internet - instrument homogenization / family whose mass publicity, in this space, erase your order - specifically, in two sites and a blog, the words that erupt on the subject-child / adolescent education in order to verify that produce effects of meaning and whom memories return them. We wanted to also verify that discursive formations (FDs) intersect these discourses, allowing understand the ideological positions put into play in the discursive processes. To achieve our goals, we start from the point of view of the senses constitute the discourse, which in turn is supported by others already said, imagined or even possible. We also believe in the individuation of the subject by the state process, since laws like the "Law Bernardo Boy" are used to regulate, regulate urban space and more specifically the family, which is so crossed by speeches from outside, on the other place. The analytical undertaken gesture pointed out, that these materiality, there is a return to the same areas of speech, that is, are produced different formulations of saying already sedimented about education of the subject child-teen, producing the effects of the "new", the "never said, "and that predominates in them the authoritative discourse, not making room for opposition and polysemy. In the selected corpus, nonverbal also contributes to the production of the senses and the selected SDs, knowledge intersect from different areas: traffic, Psychology, Pedagogy and Law, but there is no sliding directions. Those entities signing the materiality analyzed identify with the State speech, and family, challenged by this speech, erases your real, submitting to him, through their laws. |
