Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Dayrell, Cristiano de Castro
 |
Orientador(a): |
Ribeiro, Diaulas Costa
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidade e Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Resumo em Inglês: |
The present study deals with the sonship resulting from gestational surrogacy. Alongside the origins of biological, socio-affective, and adoption kinship, which establishes the sonship, a fourth origin is defended called parental autonomy. This conclusion results from the interpretation based on the Constitution, especially from the conjugation of the principles of the dignity of the human person, in the aspect of autonomy, of the free family planning, and the inscribed rule in art. 226, ?? 7, of the Constitution, that indicates that the parenting of children born through assisted reproduction techniques, including gestational surrogacy, must be attributed to the idealizers of the parental project. The contribution of this study is in the sense of removing the socio-affective origin for the establishment of sonship in medically assisted procreation, as defended by the great majority of doctrine, showing that the origin of kinship based on parental autonomy is autonomous. This conclusion, decisively, interferes in the solution of several problems related to the parenting of these children, reducing the interference of moral and religious theories in the legal environment. Resolution No. 2,168 / 2017, of the Conselho Federal de Medicina, which deals with medical ethics on assisted reproduction, and Provision No. 63/2017 of the Conselho Nacional de Justi??a, which regulates the civil registry of children born using these techniques, are discussed to show the correctness and mistakes of these norms. It is necessary to create rules that establish sonship resulting from the techniques of reproduction assisted by the Congresso Nacional to stabilize the normative expectations of those who intend or have already used these techniques. Regulating sonship is essential, but it is not enough. It is necessary to establish legal rules for the protection of persons involved in the procedure, avoiding bad medical practices, commercial exploitation and other legal problems, and punishing professionals who do not follow them. The method used was juridic-sociological, seeking to concretize the fundamental rights in question and to dialogue with other disciplines to understand the problem in a wider social environment. |
Link de acesso: |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2323
|
Resumo: |
The present study deals with the sonship resulting from gestational surrogacy. Alongside the origins of biological, socio-affective, and adoption kinship, which establishes the sonship, a fourth origin is defended called parental autonomy. This conclusion results from the interpretation based on the Constitution, especially from the conjugation of the principles of the dignity of the human person, in the aspect of autonomy, of the free family planning, and the inscribed rule in art. 226, ?? 7, of the Constitution, that indicates that the parenting of children born through assisted reproduction techniques, including gestational surrogacy, must be attributed to the idealizers of the parental project. The contribution of this study is in the sense of removing the socio-affective origin for the establishment of sonship in medically assisted procreation, as defended by the great majority of doctrine, showing that the origin of kinship based on parental autonomy is autonomous. This conclusion, decisively, interferes in the solution of several problems related to the parenting of these children, reducing the interference of moral and religious theories in the legal environment. Resolution No. 2,168 / 2017, of the Conselho Federal de Medicina, which deals with medical ethics on assisted reproduction, and Provision No. 63/2017 of the Conselho Nacional de Justi??a, which regulates the civil registry of children born using these techniques, are discussed to show the correctness and mistakes of these norms. It is necessary to create rules that establish sonship resulting from the techniques of reproduction assisted by the Congresso Nacional to stabilize the normative expectations of those who intend or have already used these techniques. Regulating sonship is essential, but it is not enough. It is necessary to establish legal rules for the protection of persons involved in the procedure, avoiding bad medical practices, commercial exploitation and other legal problems, and punishing professionals who do not follow them. The method used was juridic-sociological, seeking to concretize the fundamental rights in question and to dialogue with other disciplines to understand the problem in a wider social environment. |