Prova por ind??cios: uma an??lise ?? luz da infer??ncia para a explica????o mais coerente

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Nardi, Ricardo Perin
• Orientador(a): Aguiar, J??lio C??sar de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito
• Departamento: Escola de Humanidade e Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Processo penal; Prova por ind??cios; Argumento probat??rio
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: DIREITO
• Resumo em Inglês: This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis.
• Link de acesso: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2221

This study supports the idea that circumstantial evidence makes possible to obtain the truth in criminal procedure. Therefore, we argue, first, that the truth obtained in criminal procedure doesn???t differ from the truth obtained in other branches of science, although there are certain limitations imposed by other similar weight values of the truth, such as sealing the taking of evidence by illegal terms. Having established this premise and adopting the theory of truth as correspondence, we argue that the analysis of the evidentiary argument must submit the inference to the most coherent theory of the case, which basically consists of a logical method of analysis of evidential reasoning that the hypothesis must explain more coherently the available evidence, which supports the hypothesis.