Educa????o em sexualidade: perspectivas na vida de adolescentes e jovens?

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Neves, Mariana Braga Alves de Souza
• Orientador(a): Gomes, Candido Alberto
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa Strictu Sensu em Educa????o
• Departamento: Escola de Educa????o, Tecnologia e Comunica????o
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Educa????o; Sexualidade; Juventude; AIDS (Doen??a); Gravidez; Adolescente; Ensino m??dio
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Resumo em Inglês: The education sector's efforts to reduce sexual behavior risky of young people is still insufficient and braked by prejudices and taboos related to sexuality education. The 10-24 years old young people are vulnerable structurally and socially to: pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender, sexual violence, racial and ethnic discrimination, symbolic violence inside and outside the school, including bullying by these themes. School appears as one of the few institutional spaces for dialogue on sexuality education. In this sense, we carried out a study to analyze the perceptions of students and teachers of an educational center of high school in the Federal District before the sexuality education strategies. We opted for a case study, and observation, structured interviews and focus groups as a research technique with questionnaires as a research tool. The school that were researched incorporate educational activities concerning sexuality issue in the school routine for more than a decade. Although the project is considered successful by adolescent and youth perception, still walks with difficulty, such as the absence in the Pedagogical Political Plan, either by the end perspective when leading teacher leaving school. The project has the support of the students, the main stakeholders for the theme, and the charismatic leadership of a biology teacher. The trajectory of the project is winding, with shifting of direction and support, according to evidence, teachers prefer not to get involved with a "controversy" theme. In other words, the project does not develop its full potential because they lack domestic support, or they are presented ambiguously, with the exception of students most interested. The main results were identified: there was no increase in sexual practices due to the inclusion of sexuality education issues at school; most students consider important access condoms at school; reduction of pregnancy in school; expansion of dialogue between parents and children about sexuality; increase the school's relationship with the health service and reducing discrimination related to sexuality issues in school.
• Link de acesso: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/1990

The education sector's efforts to reduce sexual behavior risky of young people is still insufficient and braked by prejudices and taboos related to sexuality education. The 10-24 years old young people are vulnerable structurally and socially to: pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender, sexual violence, racial and ethnic discrimination, symbolic violence inside and outside the school, including bullying by these themes. School appears as one of the few institutional spaces for dialogue on sexuality education. In this sense, we carried out a study to analyze the perceptions of students and teachers of an educational center of high school in the Federal District before the sexuality education strategies. We opted for a case study, and observation, structured interviews and focus groups as a research technique with questionnaires as a research tool. The school that were researched incorporate educational activities concerning sexuality issue in the school routine for more than a decade. Although the project is considered successful by adolescent and youth perception, still walks with difficulty, such as the absence in the Pedagogical Political Plan, either by the end perspective when leading teacher leaving school. The project has the support of the students, the main stakeholders for the theme, and the charismatic leadership of a biology teacher. The trajectory of the project is winding, with shifting of direction and support, according to evidence, teachers prefer not to get involved with a "controversy" theme. In other words, the project does not develop its full potential because they lack domestic support, or they are presented ambiguously, with the exception of students most interested. The main results were identified: there was no increase in sexual practices due to the inclusion of sexuality education issues at school; most students consider important access condoms at school; reduction of pregnancy in school; expansion of dialogue between parents and children about sexuality; increase the school's relationship with the health service and reducing discrimination related to sexuality issues in school.