Análise sociorretórica de introduções de artigos científicos no quadro dos letramentos acadêmicos de graduandos pibidianos em três áreas disciplinares.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Iraci Nobre da lattes
Orientador(a): Bezerra, Benedito Gomes
Banca de defesa: Dionisio, Angela Paiva, Alves Filho, Francisco, Pimentel, Renato Lira, Caiado, Roberta Varginha Ramos
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Doutorado em Ciências da Linguagem
Departamento: Departamento de Pós-Graduação
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1358
Resumo: The substantial increase in research on genres in the most diverse fields of analysis, whether in the academic, professional, institutional or other fields, has revolutionized the way of seeing genres, contrasting them with the conceptions that understood them, only, as formal structures or confused them with the notion of textual type. In this research, our objective is to investigate how PIBID scholarship students from three subject areas, Literature Linguistics, History and Biological Sciences, perform the rhetorical movements in the introduction of the scientific article, in relation to the conventional communicative purposes of the article. We analyzed a corpus made up of 30 introductions of articles by undergraduate students, researchers from the Institutional Program for Teaching Initiation Scholarships (PIBID / CAPES). We support our research on the assumptions of Swales (1990); Miller (2012); Bazerman (2005; 2011; 2015); Bawarshi and Reiff (2013); Bezerra (2012; 2015; 2017); Biasi-Rodrigues (2009); Motta-Roth and Hendges (2010); Pereira (2019), among others. We base the analysis on the CARS model, postulated by Swales (1990), regarding the introductory section of the article, which brings aspects of the understanding of the work that identify the construction of knowledge and the design of the research carried out in movements, steps and purposes with specific communicative goals. From the analysis of the corpus, we realized that of the eleven steps arranged in the CARS model, nine were performed, but three were recurrent in the three disciplinary areas, they are: Making generalizations about the subject, Outlining the objectives and Announcing the present research. This leads us to realize that the writing of the undergraduate students in the three different subject areas has similar information mobilization. The analysis of the corpus revealed three additional steps to the CARS Model: Presenting theoretical support; Describing the methodological procedures and Linking the study to a project, with total recurrence in the area of Linguistic Letters and partial in the area of History. Based on the results, we realized that, even in the process of appropriating academic literacies, the authors of the introductions of the analyzed articles managed to distribute the information in the introduction of the scientific article, carrying out the moves and communicative purposes typical of the genre.