Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2004 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Pinheiro, Luciane Cristina |
| Orientador(a): |
Tagliavini, João Virgílio
 |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação - PPGE
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/2787
|
Resumo: |
In this dissertation, an analysis of the three last decades of the 20th century was done, with an emphasis in the trial of productive reconstruction and the new liberalism reforms and its impact in the education, especially to the workers technical-professional formation. In that sense we are going to show that the real capitalism lives a moment of structural crisis, what carries its ideologists and spokesmen of the status quo. It will create powerful ideologies that decree the “end of the history”, give “good-bye to the proletariat” and celebrate a new society, the “society of knowledge”. The direct impact of such ideologies in the education has been the need of its attribute to the schools, especially to the technical education and the formation of new persons, who will be: supportive, adaptive, participative, autonomous, creative. In short, more connive with the needs of the output capitalist and of the new social pact that encloses itself at the present. In a society marked by massive unemployment, precarious actions of the relations of work, misery increase, intolerance, drugs trafficking, and mainly, in a moment of structural crisis of the capitalism, we look to attribute to the individual, the continuous capacity of adaptabilities of a deeply uneven society, substantiated in antagonizing and conflicting classes. The new face of theory of the human capital, the employability, upon transferring to the individual the gross responsibility about the “management of his career”, ends up conferring him the obligation to be capable to resolve conflicts of any dimension, from structural unemployment to the problems of social and political order. We show that such ideologies are barely going to guarantee the permanence of the society of bourgeois classes, as well as, upon legitimizing a perverse social order, the alienates and the excluded, make it possible of any radical change in any given situation. We also demonstrate that today, capitalism only can continue existing upon shielding itself under strong stateowned protection, or rather, the State became, “real”, in the beginning of this century, “the armed arm of the bourgeois”. |
