Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2008 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Fonseca, Débora Faria |
Orientador(a): |
Giordano, Raquel de Lima Camargo
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia - PPGBiotec
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/6942
|
Resumo: |
The Gram-positive genus Bacillus is of great biotechnological importance. Their ability to secrete enzymes efficiently during fermentation is exploited for the production of extracellular enzymes such as penicillin G acylase (PGA). Bacillus megaterium has proven to be an excellent alternative host to Escherichia coli for heterologous gene expression. Unlike other bacilli strains, proteolytic degradation by alkaline proteases is avoided. In addition, there are no endotoxins found in the cell wall. As a result, protein yields are exceptionally high even if inexpensive substrates are used. In this work, the growth conditions of B. megaterium ATCC 14945 and its preparation for transformation by electroporation with plasmid DNA had been studied. Vegetative cells and protoplasts of B. megaterium had been used. Plasmid DNAs (pET- 32, pETduet-1, pBR322 and pHis 1522) were prepared from E. coli strains DH5α and BL21. Bacteria cultures were growth in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth, Nutrient or LBS (LB containing 0,5 M sorbitol) medium. It had been used the following Electroporation Media: 25% PEG 6000/0.1 M Sorbitol (Moro et al., 1995), 0.625 M Sacarose/1.0 mM MgCl2, pH 5.5 (Dunny et al., 1991), HEPES 10 mM, pH 7.0 (Belliveau & Trevors, 1989) and SMG (0.5 M sorbitol, 0.5 M manitol and 10% glicerol) (Xue et al., 1999). As Recovery Media after electric pulses, LB and LBSM (LB containing 0,5 M sorbitol and 0.38 M manitol) had been used. Extractions of genomic DNA of B. megaterium and plasmid DNA of E. coli had been carried through. The Colonies Forming Units method (CFU) was applied in order to analyze the B. megaterium viability before and after treatment with Electroporation Media. The biomass produced (Cx) was analyzed spectrophotometrically and by the Dry Mass method. The morphology and pureness of B. megaterium cultures had been studied by optic microscopy preparations and B. megaterium growth in liquid selective media. The best electric conditions for electroporation had been established by preliminary tests. B. megaterium transformations was performed according to protocols described by Moro et al. (1995), Dunny et al. (1991), Belliveau & Trevors (1989), Xue et al. (1999) and Romero et al. (2006). The B. megaterium growth curves in LB, Nutrient and LBS had allowed the identification of growth phases of cultures and the respective electric conditions adjustment for electroporation protocols. The cellular concentration (dry mass) found for 16 hours of culture in Nutrient, LB and LBS medium had been 1.900 g/L, 2.649 g/L and 2.320 g/L, respectively. The viable cells concentration analyses (UFC) had allowed the adjustment of plasmid DNA concentrations employed and transformation efficiencies calculation. It had been found the following cellular densities of B. megaterium grown in Nutrient, LB and LBS medium respectively after PEG/Sorbitol Electroporation Medium treatment: 8.8 x 108; 9,2 x 108 and 2.3 x 109 UFC/mL. For Sacarose/MgCl2, it had been found 2,8 x 107; 4.6 x 108 and 3.7 x 108 UFC/mL and for HEPES 5.6 x 108; 2.93 x 109 and 1.86 x 108. For SMG, it had been found 1,7 x 109; 9.4 x 109 and 1.1 x 1010 UFC/mL for Nutrient, LB and LBS medium, respectively. |