Comparando o efeito de contingência de grupo independente e interdependente sobre o desempenho escolar em matemática
Ano de defesa: | 2021 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa Interinstitucional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas - PIPGCF
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/15178 |
Resumo: | The present research replicated studies in social behavior ((Lloyd, Eberhardt & Drake, 1996; Pigott, Fantuzzo, Heggie & Clement, 1984), focusing more specifically on assessing outcomes produced by different group contingencies. Group contingencies are effective in modifying unwanted behaviors and increasing school performance. The aim of the present study was to compare an independent and an interdependent group contingency on the frequency of correctly answering math exercises. Twenty students, both genders, from fourth grade of Elementary School (Cycle 1), from a public school, in a city in the interior of São Paulo, participated in the study. Participants were divided into five groups and each group member performed math exercises with 60 addition and subtraction operations (all exercises were numerical) over a period of ten minutes per session. Reverse designs (ABCA) were used for three groups (Groups 1, 2 and 3), and (ACBA) for the other two groups (Groups 4 and 5). The A condition served as a baseline and no reinforcers were offered. ln B condition, reinforcers were provided by individual performance, required in the group activity. ln condition C reinforcers were provided based on the average performance of the group activity. The results of the present study show that averages of the frequency of correct answers for conditions B and C were higher than for conditions A. However, the participants did not have differences related to means and standard error between conditions B and C. |