Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Fröner, Felipe
 |
Orientador(a): |
Tesheiner, José Maria Rosa
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4236
|
Resumo: |
This paper studies three fundamental themes of international civil procedure . For this, the first part sets up the theoretical framework of the research, assuming that the science of law, as cultivated at present, is a practical discipline, and purely positive models are insufficient for proper interpretation and application of the law. It follows by selecting the model of discursive reasoning of moral judgments, connected it with the alexyan theory of legal reasoning, in the sense that reality cuts the speech, but the speech conforms reality. This is connected with the empirical argument, which is associated with increased frequency of international interactions. In the second part, we study the fundamental issues related to the handling of legal positions qualified by the note of internationality. First, in relation to cases of decentralized application of uniform standards, we study the issue of normative hierarchy between domestic and international law. Second, for the cases in which there is multiconected relationships, we studied the use of mechanisms of international civil procedure in weak sense, that is, mechanisms related primarily to the definition of the 'competent' state jurisdiction in relation to other states, as well as the international movement of judicial acts. Third, as regards properly international relations and the cases in which uniform standard (=international) appy, we look at the use of mechanisms of international civil procedure in strong sense, that is, management of processes regulated in international instruments and developed in centralized spaces (= international court). |