Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Primo, Guilherme de Brito
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Castro, Fábio Caprio Leite de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
|
| Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidades
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8617
|
Resumo: |
Our work is aimed at analyzing and problematizing war and violence through a philosophical approach based on the category of biopower, especially through the works of Giorgio Agamben and Antonio Negri. On the one hand, Agamben's analyzes of the state of exception support a reading of biopower centered on a tanatopolitics of the making of survival, the production of a survival, a bare, nude life, or, in other words, a power of exposure to death, which has as a contemporary paradigm the concentration camps. On the other hand, Antonio Negri observes in war active and productive characteristics, fundamentally linked to the processes of globalization and juridical supranationalization, which, with the smoothing of imperial space and the approximation of inequalities, normalize a state of permanent war, a bellic governamentality, investing life and space social, in all its spheres, in a plot of constant violence: a walled life, protected, watched and securitized. At any rate, what remains of the two perspectives, which runs through both analyzes, is the centrality of life, whether through its investment in security devices, dispositifs, or in its exposure to the sovereign decision, to the power of death. Our proposal of work is situated in this double effect that accompanies the category of biopower, trying to analyze and problematize it: if the state of global war is characterized, in the thought of Antonio Negri and Giorgio Agamben as a regime of biopower, while a permanent relationship, what are their effects? Does it produce life, forms of life, a walled and protected life, or is it instead centered on the production of death and survival, the exposure to death that characterizes mere life, naked life? In this sense, would it be possible to find common ground between the two postulates? If this state of global war is permeated by supranational dynamics, what is the role of the state and sovereign power? Is there an articulation between the imperial order and the policies of exception? |
