Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Sant'Anna, Marcelo Almeida
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pozzebon, Fabricio Dreyer Avila de
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Criminais
|
| Departamento: |
Escola de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8031
|
Resumo: |
Doctorate thesis in Criminal Sciences, developed in Concentration Area Criminal System and Violence and linked in Field of Research Contemporary Legal-Criminal Systems. The analysis of the criminal field allows us to evidence the existence of a constitutional deficit, especially in the preliminary phase of the criminal process. Investigation, as a space of power and as a procedure for the production of truths, is not properly connected to the procedural stage, which ends up by broadening excessively discretion, producing unilateral knowledge. Adversary proceeding and right to a fair hearing are constitutional principles applicable to both stages of criminal prosecution, albeit at different intensity. Therefore, there is a need for a procedural interim period prior to the criminal complaint, made in the form of a preliminary hearing. In the end, the a result of reaserch allowed device a bill. |
