Diretrizes curriculares nacionais do curso de graduação em farmácia e o sistema de avaliação da educação superior : análise crítico-reflexiva da prova do ENADE 2010

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Ott, Joice Nedel
• Orientador(a): Costa, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina e Ciências da Saúde
• Departamento: Faculdade de Medicina
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: FARMÁCIA - ENSINO - BRASIL; ENSINO SUPERIOR; CURRÍCULO UNIVERSITÁRIO; EDUCAÇÃO E SAÚDE; EXAME NACIONAL DE DESEMPENHO DE ESTUDANTES
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::MEDICINA
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/1786

The National Examination Performance of Students (ENADE) part of the National System of Higher Education Assessment (SINAES), as a mandatory curriculum component in undergraduate courses (BRAZIL, 2004), in order to monitor the process of academic learning in relation the precepts established by the National Curriculum Guidelines (DCN). In this research there was a critical and reflective analysis of the issues of proof of ENADE held by scholars of Pharmacy in 2010, through the opinion of teachers linked to the School of Pharmacy of institutions, public and private, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS). The main objective was to verify if the character of evidence and evaluation order are consistent with the recommendations by the Pharmacy course (DCNF) for the training and evaluation of general professional National Curriculum Guidelines. Through Qualtrics Survey Software, four separate questionnaires, each containing 10 questions originally transcribed the ENADE and categories of analysis established from the assumptions of DCNF were prepared. The questionnaires were sent by digital means teachers allocated to 18 courses Pharmacy RS of 16 different higher education institutions. From March to September 2013, 131 teachers conducted the analysis of the 40 questions ENADE 2010. Specific issues of component, with a mean score 7.78±2.22 in teacher perception on the appropriateness of the examination, evaluated more exercise capacity in drugs and medicines, critical and reflective skills required of the student and interdisciplinary approach. Questions of General Education, which received an average score 5.16±2.87 in the opinion of the teachers, helped in understanding the social, cultural and economic reality of the environment in which the professional was inserted and lower acuity, assessed the character critical and reflective, humanistic and ethical principles required by DCNF. Thus, the proof of ENADE 2010 held by graduates in Pharmacy presented asymmetric distribution of the aspects of training set. Although it is believed that the current evaluation system of higher education can indeed contribute to improving the quality of vocational training, the proposed test has limitations in the evaluation process with students. These limitations, the present study evidenced through teacher opinion, corroborated findings literary evidenced by Verhine; Dantas (2005); Rothen; Nasciutti (2008); Rodrigues; Peixoto (2009), Dias Sobrinho (2010) and Francisco et al. (2012), who warn about the structuring of the evaluation system and the implementation in the way it currently presents. However, the quest for improvement, it is observed that the national educational policy has focused on constantly improving the quality of education, contextualized by encouraging research like this that drives the construction of an evaluation process that will determine the quality of training for professionals being inserted into society, whether from the general training offered to social needs are being met effectively at all levels of health care.