Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Cipriano, Rodrigo Carneiro
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Finkelstein, Cláudio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/5849
|
Resumo: |
The ever growing need for cooperation on the international plane led states, from the mid-19th century onwards, to create institutional structures currently known as international organizations, to which the exercise of global governance was progressively assigned. Due to the activity performed by such entities, which remains scarcely regulated by general international law, different theories were formulated as to explain the foundations of its powers, each of them differently establishing the limits of international organizations competences. The attributed powers doctrine posits that international organizations possess only those powers expressly laid down in the constitutive treaties, which should be restrictively interpreted, so that organisms can only act based on States will as literally manifested in constitutional provisions. Conversely, the theory of implied powers sustains that international organizations constitutions should be more loosely interpreted, defending that, in addition to the powers expressly conferred, there are others implicitly existent, which can be deduced from express powers or even from the organisms objectives. In its turn, according to the inherent powers doctrine, the founding States will is neither the source of the legal personality of international organizations nor of its competences, postulating that international law itself confer to organisms all the powers deemed necessary to perform its functions, limited solely by statutory prohibitions. The research conducted aimed at providing an outlook of these theories, verifying that, despite the predominance of the implied powers doctrine, the three theories are not necessarily excludent and can be jointly applied, given that each organization s specificities are properly considered |
