Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Mello e Souza, Débora de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Bassani, Marlise Aparecida
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/29629
|
Resumo: |
The 2030 agenda, a United Nations initiative (UN, 2015), projects into contemporaneity facing a globalized and technologically interconnected world, where information has not always been aligned to the daily direct experience of people, thus bringing forth the need to question upon how enunciations communicating this agenda have been realized. This study overall objective, in its descriptive nature, was to investigate perceptions about everyday closeness and distance regarding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2030 Agenda. The method has consisted of four steps. At the first step, 265 participants evaluated, via MAP-ODS1 Questionnaire, how close they were to each SDG regarding their daily lives by using grades from 0 (totally distant) to 5 (totally close). Two hundred and twelve participants showed some interest in going on to subsequent steps. From the statistical analysis, 56 participants with diverse answer patterns were selected into the second step, Online Dialogues, where they considered their answers and reflections on the previous tool. This step has been completed by 29 participants, all of them invited into the third step, where 5 group meetings, with up to 5 participants, would be held. At the end of each group step, the invited participants were given the online MAP-ODS2 Questionnaire, and this was the fourth step. Twenty-one participants completed this final step, and they analyzed their proxemic grades again, as well as the impact of each study step on their reflections. Barriers and facilitators indicated by participants in their reports concerning how close they were to SDGs have been analyzed, with the contributions to this survey procedures being also analyzed based on socionomic epistemology and the promotion of prosustainability themes. The participants characterized the study procedures as a relevant experience about lifestyle, roles, and the acquisition of new habits and values. Eight benchmarks of proxemic grades used by participants have been identified by the participants as they approached the SDGs: personal action; other people´s action; institutional action; access; affection; knowledge; importance; willingness. On the method contributions, this is the conclusion: at the Dialogues step, part of the participants evaluated the MAP-ODS1 tool as having a neutral impact, and another part of them saw it as a moment of reflection on feelings of either power or powerlessness before SDGs; the reflection on roles has been indicated as relevant by all participants, and their association with other procedures has been indicated as a factor for enhancing the understanding of possible action. According to the participants, the steps collectively experienced were the ones that contributed the most to their reflections, driving them to everyday actions: Out of the 21 participants, 60% reported they were interested in adding SDG themes to their daily life, and 40% reported an interest in making them highpriority topics in their lives. The MAP – ODS2 results indicate the interest of participants in 2030 Agenda has been augmented, at the same time that changes in terms of nearness and distance perception have been experienced in different positions, roles and contexts. The study points to the importance of working with different dimensions on daily life by disclosing barriers and drivers to 2030 Agenda SDG implementation. The present study has been conducted under the support by CNPq, the National Board for Scientific and Technological Development – Brazil. Project approved: 870439/1997-1999 |
