Violência estatal em face da rede de contato do encarcerado no estado de São Paulo: uma análise crítica sobre a política de contato com o preso

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: Falleiros, Lúcia Alonso
• Orientador(a): Junqueira,Gustavo Octaviano Diniz
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Intranscendência da pena; Execução penal; Rede de contato do encarcerado; Violência do Estado; Contato com o mundo exterior no cárcere
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Punishment intranscendence; Criminal enforcement; Prisoner’s contact network; State violence; Contact with the outside world in prison
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/43669

The Democratic State of Law is characterized by the State’s commitment to upholdingthe principle of Human Dignity. This model idealizes the prison system as an environment for rehabilitation and social reintegration of prisoners. In practice, however, it is marked by the abuse of force by the State, namely, violence. Such violence impacts not only the prisoners but also their contact network. The prisoner contact network is stigmatized and routinely violated by the State. These situations must be studied and addressed, to guarantee the effectiveness of the Democratic State of Law for those involved with the prison system, especially those who aren’t convicted themselves. The key principles involving the prisoner’s contact network are individualization, punishment intranscendence and the Human Dignity principle. The concern about the prisoner’s contact network emerged as prisons became increasingly isolated from the urban centers. This detachment led to greater stigmatization and increased interference in the prisoner’s contact network. Transcendence became the standard, whether because it stigmatizes the prisoner’s contact network, through stricter rules on visitation and correspondence, or through the failure to uphold the principles of individualization and punishment intranscendence. The discussion about the prisoner’s contact network violence suffering and rights expanded in the judiciary through the General Repercussion Issue nº 998 of the Federal Supreme Court. This case highlighted a stark reality: the existing rules and their implementation are dichotomic: the normative framework advocate for the punishment intranscendence, yet the practice stigmatizes and transfers the punishment to the prisoner’s contact network. The transcendence effects are social, economic, cultural, and psychological, fostering fear within the prisoner’s contact network’s in relation to the State. Fear amplifies the transcendence effect, because it discourages questioning, tolerates abuses, and leads to the acceptance of non-compliance practices, which perpetuates violent treatment. The State normalizes and naturalizes violent practices. The State must not continue to support such behaviors. Instead, it must recognize the violent rules, illegitimate under constitutional principles, eliminate them from the legal system and adopt practical measures to change State conduct, both in visitation and correspondence exchange process. Absolut intranscendence is unattainable, but the State must act aligned with society to not trivializing violent practices, actively undermining them