Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2006 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Camargo, Sandro Rogério |
| Orientador(a): |
Santos, Neusa Maria Bastos Fernandes |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Contábeis e Atuariais
|
| Departamento: |
Ciências Cont. Atuariais
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/1554
|
Resumo: |
This research had the objective of finding out in the teacher of the Accountancy Course of the State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG) had had any kind of formation or previus preparation when they started their careers as university professors, as well as to identify the necessities for the formation of teachers. It also tried to obtain suggestions form former and presentday students and from the teachers themselves in order to identify ways of supplying theses necessities. The diagnosed necessities were then divided into three categories: a) formation necessities related to aspects of techinical knowledge; b) formation necessities related to didactic-pedagogical knowledge; and c) formation necessities related to behavioral aspects. This study is relevant and necessary because the professor is one of the mainprotagonists in the teaching-learning process and he/she often becomes a professor by chance, without any previous preparation, so that identifying the conditions in which he/she acquired his/her formation is the first step towards the implementation of actions for the pro-fessional development and the improvement of accountancy teaching. In order to accomplish this, the research was carried out as a case study, and data were collected in two stages. In the first stage, individual interviews with some professors were carried out and group interviews (focus group) were done with other professors. In the second stage, questionnaires were applied to former and presentday students of Accountancy. The study showed that tem out of eighteen (55,56%) of the enterviewed professors had had some kind of previous preparation for teaching at the university, but only one of them was prepared by UEPG. It also showed that, out of the ten that had some previous preparation, three had gotten acquainted withpedagogical aspects only throught the discipline Higher Education Methodology in specialization courses; two others, besids this discipline, had also had a curse in pedagogical formation for the Ensino Médio . Two professors had taken a specific course in University Methodology, besides the already mentioned discipline; one had concluded the Magistério Course, andanother one, who had graduated in History, stated he had received pedagogical training there. The two data collecting techniques showed that 66,67% of the interviwed professors needed formation in the behavioral aspect, 72,22% needed didactic-pedagogical formation, and 100% needed general formation. As for the suggestions obtaind from the interviews, those offered by the professors were evasive and generic, while the students s were more objective and speci-fic |
