Discurso parlamentar: retextualização e (des)cortesia em foco

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Maria Rodrigues de
• Orientador(a): Fávero, Leonor Lopes
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
• Departamento: Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Discurso parlamentar; (Des)cortesia; Face
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Parliamentary speech; (Dis)courtesy; Textual reformulation
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS::LINGUA PORTUGUESA
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/19243

This research is part of the Line of Research ‘Text and discourse in the oral and written modalities’, of the Postgraduate Studies Program in the Portuguese Language of the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, and deals with parliamentary speeches, focusing on their retextualization and on the (dis)courtesy present in these speeches, especially that arising from requests of corrections to be made in another's speech. In parliamentary sessions, it is common for speakers to utter words considered discourteous by their peers, who request the correction of these words in the retextualized text to save their own faces or third-party faces. From the hypotheses that such requests for corrections would in fact aid in the expansion of the threat to the faces in the plenary sessions and that the corrections in the retextualized speeches would not contribute to saving those same faces, in addition to the certainty that some retextualization practices may lead to a distortion of what the speaker has said, this research aims to answer the following questions: a) do requests for corrections in another’s speech in a plenary session contribute to saving threatened faces or cause an exacerbation of the threat?; b) do the corrections made by retextualizers in response to such requests fulfill the task of saving faces in the written text?; c) do the corrections made by retextualizers in order to make speeches meet the standards recommended by the legislative bodies or for personal reasons have an effect on aspects of (dis)courtesy? Based on studies of Discourse Analysis, Text Linguistics, Conversation Analysis and Interactional Sociolinguistics, in addition to procedure manuals of legislative bodies, relevant legislation, this thesis analyzes a corpus made up of four blocks of speeches delivered in the House of Representatives. The results obtained suggest that: a) the requests for corrections of another's speech at plenary sessions do not contribute to saving faces but causes an expansion of the threat; b) corrections made by retextualizers in response to such requests do not fulfill the face saving task but, to the contrary, they aid in arousing an interest in the threats; c) the corrections made by retextualizers to adjust speeches to the standards recommended by legislative bodies or for personal reasons can result both in the insertion of courtesy and of discourtesy in the speeches published in the written form. This research is justified by the need to contribute to an awareness of the relevance of the written record of parliamentary speeches and to the changing of retextualization practices in order to prioritize what is said in the speeches, not what the speaker should or would have said. Therefore, this thesis brings contributions to the task of retextualizing parliamentary speeches and intends to arouse the attention of researchers to this vast field of study that is still little explored