Governança Corporativa no modelo da Organização Social de Saúde do Estado de São Paulo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Rosania Nascimento lattes
Orientador(a): Amorim, Maria Cristina Sanches lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Administração
Departamento: Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contábeis e Atuariais
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/1115
Resumo: Part of the Reform Plan of the State's strategy was to transfer at the end of the 90s, to the non public sector producing services such as health, education and culture, seeking to promote greater efficiency and quality services. A key strategy was the creation of social organizations (OS). Since 1998, the State Health Department of São Paulo (SES) transferred the management of hospitals to these organizations through management contracts that discriminated objectives and targets to be achieved for the production of health services. Due to the fact that it was the management of public money, the corporate governance issue was relevant to public administration. The research evaluates the governance in the social organization of health SPDM - Association for the Development of Medicine as the criteria for accountability (account responsibility) and transparency through the analysis of existing, contracts and reports that regulate OSS legislation. The research results show that the criteria for accountability and transparency - important to ensure good governance in the public sector elements - according to the literature examined were not achieved considering that: the government of Sao Paulo is the main buyer, payer and performance controller of these organizations; in compliance with the time limits due to law enforcement for accountability; the quality of information of the S.E.S. to the departments of external control and the difficulty of access to information for stakeholders