Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Almeida, Ricardo Monteiro Guedes de
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pacheco Filho, Raul Albino |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Serviço Social
|
| Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/16973
|
Resumo: |
The goal of this present research is to bring to the discussion what contribution the sinthome joyciano represented to psychoanalysis, as regards psychotic stabilizations. In the context of mental health, the unique solutions that the psychotic subjects present us requires clinic theoretical understanding of psychoses that go beyond a clinic of the metaphor, without necessarily abandon it, but including a notion of substitution that is not restricted to the delusional metaphor. To this end, we review the major stabilisation strategies addressed by Lacan, giving emphasis to the sinthome and the paradigmatic case of Joyce. This research will be a theoretical Job that is not intended to create a literary reflection of the work of the Irish writer, James Joyce. Although we approach the writing of Joyce, with their puzzles and their unusual epiphanies, our focus will continue to be the sinthome joyciano as an example of Scripture that makes, sustaining, so node Borromean knot, the Union of the three registers: the real, the symbolic and the imaginary. On our journey, we came to the conclusion that the sinthome joyciano, represents a solution of his paternal failure, a natural necessity of his foraclusão in fact in an earlier period to trigger psychotic himself. Represented in the clinic of psychosis, and still represents an alternate example, that although exercise the same function of the name-of-the-father, does not concern the significant Parent-name, as well as undeniable evidence of that, beyond the metaphor would be delusional a multiplicity of natural solutions that the psychotic subject could present |
